Let's be honest about something that the wellness industry does not want to have a straightforward conversation about: a massive portion of what gets sold as modern self-help, mindfulness, and spiritual practice in the West was developed, refined, and documented in the Indian subcontinent over thousands of years — and the people who built it rarely get the credit, the money, or even the acknowledgment.
Start with yoga. The practice showing up in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras around 400 CE wasn't a fitness class. It was an eight-limbed philosophical and spiritual system aimed at the cessation of mental fluctuations — the stilling of the "citta vritti" — as a path toward liberation. The asanas (physical postures) were one limb out of eight, and the least discussed in classical texts. Fast forward to the modern West: yoga becomes a $37 billion industry dominated by Lululemon, Instagram flexibility content, and "hot yoga" studios in strip malls. The spiritual scaffolding that gave the postures meaning is quietly stripped out. The Indian teachers who brought it West — Swami Vivekananda, Paramahansa Yogananda, B.K.S. Iyengar — are footnotes. The brand is everything.
Mindfulness is the same story. The practice of sati (Pali) or smriti (Sanskrit) — present-moment, non-judgmental awareness — is documented in Buddhist and Hindu texts going back to 600 BCE or earlier, rooted in the Vedas and Upanishads even before the Buddha formalized it. Jon Kabat-Zinn's Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program at UMass in 1979 mainstreamed the technique in Western medicine, which is genuinely valuable — but in the translation, the ethical foundation, the spiritual context, and the original traditions it came from were deliberately de-emphasized to make it "secular" and therefore palatable to Western institutions. The result: corporations now offer "mindfulness training" to make workers more productive. The monks who developed it as a path to liberation from suffering would find that darkly ironic.
Carl Jung is one of the more complex figures in this story. He traveled to India in the 1930s and spent serious time engaging with Hindu and Vedantic philosophy — the concepts of the collective unconscious, archetypes, shadow, individuation — these all have clear parallels in Hindu thought that Jung absorbed and then reframed in Western psychological language. Some scholars argue this was genuine synthesis. Others argue it was rebranding with the serial numbers filed off. Jung himself held complicated and sometimes contradictory views on whether Eastern philosophy was "appropriate" for Western minds to practice directly, which is its own kind of paternalism.
Turmeric, ashwagandha, ayurvedic medicine, chakra systems, the concept of karma, the idea of non-duality — all of these have entered Western wellness culture at varying levels of depth and distortion. The pattern is consistent: extract the element that can be commodified, strip it from its cultural and philosophical context, rebrand it with a clean sans-serif logo, and sell it back at a premium to people who have no idea where it came from.
None of this means these practices aren't powerful or that non-Hindu people shouldn't engage with them. The point is accountability and honesty. You can practice yoga, meditate, take ashwagandha, and study Vedanta — and also acknowledge clearly where these things come from, who built them, and what they originally meant. That acknowledgment costs nothing and honors something real.
Hindu philosophy has been giving the world tools for navigating consciousness, suffering, and meaning for millennia. The least the West can do is say where it got them.
Go love somebody that you don't like. I love y'all. 🙏
0 comments